?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Squeatweet! Squeatweet! - Rat Ramblings [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Nicodemus

[ website | My Website ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Squeatweet! Squeatweet! [Jun. 6th, 2012|10:51 pm]
Nicodemus
The rat is finally twittering. I know, I know.

I signed up because there were enough friends and conversations over there and the user name (nicodemusrat) was still available. So what the heck. We'll see how much I actually use it.

So what about LJ? I’ll still be here. But let me take a moment to recap where I am these days:

LJ -- I still try to read my full friends list and am about 90% successful on at least scanning everything. I post any commentary/non-fiction/social stuff more than a few sentences here (even if that means a few duplicated crosspostings). This is still my “main” site.

Twitter -- I read a bit here and there but don’t expect that I’ll see all the news you tweet. I read maybe 3% of what goes by. I plan to mainly use Twitter for tossing out photos of cooking, photos of crafts/fursuit stuff, and nonsequitor observations. This one is still new so we’ll see how that evolves as time goes on. Login is nicodemusrat.

G+ -- As much as I think the platform is cool, it does not seem to be heavily used. I read maybe 50% of what is posted here. I primarily share news articles and some photos here. Login is nicodemustherat.

FA -- As much as I think the platform is lacking, it seems to be heavily used. :P I don’t use or read FA journals. I use FA for sharing furry art (costumes, drawing, writing, etc.) and seeing the art of others. This is probably my least-used platform but I’m trying to slowly ramp up on it and showcase more of my work. Login is nicodemusrat.

LinkedIn -- On here under my real name for professional and industry contacts.

That’s the full list of my different “social networks” to connect with me. (No, I’m not on Facebook.)

Feel free to comment on this or make suggestions about sites or ways to use these sites. Since it is a social network, it’s also about the readers, so I’d like to hear what you like and what you’re doing.
LinkReply

Comments:
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]From: orv
2012-06-07 05:58 pm (UTC)
FA is proof that if a community grows up around your site, you can have the worst user interface, code, and stability around and people will still hang around. (For that matter, the same's kinda true of Facebook.)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]From: jackalopejess
2012-06-07 12:34 pm (UTC)
Consider yourself followed! I enjoy Twitter, but I still enjoy LiveJournal as well. They both have their place and purpose.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: nicodemusrat
2012-06-08 07:12 pm (UTC)
And counter-followed.

BTW, I think your Twitter user picture is the first time I've seen a photo of you! Great pic, too. :)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: shockwave77598
2012-06-07 01:55 pm (UTC)
G+ started off fine as a social network. I was an early joiner when you had to be invited. But the Google did something so boneheaded it defies logic. They took their system that was succeeding and decided they'd change from a social network to an IDENTITY network.

Had they just let G+ alone and let it grow into a social network instead of banning people with "funny names" ( there ARE people with RL names like Robin Hood you know) then they'd be far more useful. But they staked the future of their business upon whether or not some teen intern giggles at a name or not. So, F them and G+ -- I already cancelled it back when you could do so without destroying all your Google accounts if you did so.

I am gravely disappointed in Google as you can guess.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: orv
2012-06-07 05:57 pm (UTC)
Yeah, they were trying to create trust by limiting anonymous trolling, but they did it in a really boneheaded and counter-productive way. I'm a little sympathetic in that they basically just copied Facebook's policy on such things, but they really should have been smarter.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: nicodemusrat
2012-06-07 07:50 pm (UTC)
Agreed. They really shot themselves in the foot with that whole episode, both in policy itself and PR handling.

I've stayed with it because they never flagged my name and there are a few non-furs on there where it's my only contact point. But I won't pretend I'm enthusiastic about what they've done with it. I expect my G+ use will trail off.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: shockwave77598
2012-06-07 08:07 pm (UTC)
I personally would have a MUTE button so that any troll pesters you, you can press the MUTE button and then you never see whatever they write anyplace. It's one of the few things Linden Labs has done correctly. And though anyone can create disposable accounts and get around it temporarily, you are extra on your guard against day old or even week old accounts.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: orv
2012-06-07 08:23 pm (UTC)
You've reinvented the killfile. ;)

I find that doesn't work so well in forums, though, unless you can also get everyone you know to ignore the troll. Otherwise you just keep seeing the replies to the trolling. One thing that's nice about LJ is you can just outright ban someone from posting on your journal.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: orv
2012-06-07 05:57 pm (UTC)
The way I saw it put once is on Twitter you don't try to read every message -- you just sample the stream now and then. ;)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: nicodemusrat
2012-06-07 07:53 pm (UTC)
Very true and definitely the approach I'm taking. With LJ, I do try to read everything because generally it's more substantive. (An overly broad generalization there, perhaps.) But with Twitter I feel no obligations. :)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: baccala_30
2012-06-07 08:38 pm (UTC)
Even though LJ has died off I still like using this more than FA anymore, mostly when I want to talk about stuff I don't want to post anywhere else. I tweet just a few times a day and @ people on there if they say something interesting. I do have FB but that is mostly for work and relatives, no furry stuff on there.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: wildfox34
2012-06-07 09:57 pm (UTC)
I really don't use G+ anymore. I don't know why I even still have the app on my phone. Really turned into no point in having it. Added you on my twitter account though!
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: porsupah
2012-06-07 11:55 pm (UTC)
LJ easily remains my favorite. ^_^ Not just for their lack of aspirations of global information knowledge and surveillance (hi there, Google, Facebook!), but simply that it remains a superb plaform to converse on, with no arbitrary limitations on links anywhere, a wealth of icons available, selectable per message, highly configurable options regarding notifications, per-entry privacy selection for any arbitrary group of friends, and probably more I've barely considered.

I do tweet, though it's quite secondary to here in signficance; if you know me here, you're not missing much if you don't follow me there.

G+ I abandoned any interest in, as soon as the company's leaders elevated themselves to the position of knowing how everyone should be correctly known. NO. I'm not ceding my identity to Google, Facebook, or any similar pretender. That concept of governmentally issued identities, one per person, has been obsolete for a while, and lacks cause for resurrection, beyond easier monetization and agency identification.

LI I do have, but I'm not sure why, as it's been of zero utility professionally. I may keep it around, but it doesn't have much justification.

FA I gave up on a while back, tired of the photography policies that strictly forbade SL photography, but remained entirely fine with shots of your feet, guns, cars, or knives. Permitted, they were proud to note, as these were simply hallmarks of fur *affinity* - an image didn't have to be, per se, relevant to furrydom, but indicative of the inclusiveness of the site's participants' interests. Unless they involved SL, of course. =:) Why would I bother posting my wildlife photography there, given the negative discrimination? On Flickr, I don't have to be concerned about image size (1280px, even now? When most MLP comics on DA run multiple times that?), let alone the humbling standards of 500px.

DA.. I'm there technically, but I wouldn't really count myself as a participant. Not a bad place, just not really somewhere that pulls me in.

SoFurry I quite like - it's my top choice for furry artwork and stories. I have my grumbles there, too, including yet another "anything goes" photo policy, but I wind up enjoying being there, rather than vaguely uncomfortable with contact with FA.

And, of course, there's SL, home of any options you might want in your genome. ^_^ (Just, tragically, not retroactively.. for now) Not that I'm tremendously less nervous there than elsewhere, but I can enjoy being who I am. ^_^
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: nicodemusrat
2012-06-08 07:18 pm (UTC)
Pretty much the same sentiment and approach toward LJ and Twitter.

I think I have a SoFurry account but haven't used it. Still not particularly interested in SL; not needing the realtime experience so much.

Flickr is probably one I should check out. Forgot about it.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)